Real-World Evaluation of Azithromycin in Moderate to Severe URTIs in India
Introduction
Upper respiratory tract infections (URTIs) are common and pose a major health challenge, especially in developing countries. While most are viral, some may present with bacterial involvement or subsequent superinfection, often requiring antibacterial treatment. Azithromycin is preferred for its convenient dosing, low resistance risk, and good tolerability, but real-world evidence from India on its use in such cases is limited.
Aim
To evaluate the real-world effectiveness and safety of azithromycin in the management of moderate to severe URTIs.
Patient Profile
- N=427
- Adult patients (>18 years) with moderate to severe URTIs
Methods
- Subgroup analysis of a retrospective, multicenter, observational real-world study
- Duration: 12 weeks across 184 ENT centers in India.
Intervention: Azithromycin 500 mg once daily for five days
Study endpoints
Primary: Effectiveness of azithromycin measured by:
- Change in cumulative clinical score (six parameters: pharyngeal erythema, tonsillar erythema, tonsillar exudates, sore throat/swallowing pain, fever, interference with daily activities) from baseline to day 5
- Clinical Global Impression (CGI) scale rating on day 5
Secondary:
- Proportion of patients showing improvement in individual signs and symptoms from baseline to day 5
- Resolution of fever and reduction in work absenteeism by day 5
- Safety assessment
Results
Day 5 of Treatment:
By day 5, there was a highly significant improvement in all clinical parameters (p < 0.001). The total clinical score dropped from 9.7 ± 2.02 at baseline to 0.59 ± 1.24.
Table 1: Effectiveness Outcomes: Changes in Mean Clinical Score
|
Clinical Parameter |
Baseline Mean ± SD |
Day 5 Mean ± SD |
Mean Difference ± SD |
p-value |
|
Pharyngeal erythema/swelling (n=421) |
1.6 ± 0.49 |
0.17 ± 0.38 |
1.43 ± 0.57 |
<0.001 |
|
Tonsillar erythema/swelling (n=421) |
1.64 ± 0.48 |
0.12 ± 0.32 |
1.52 ± 0.55 |
<0.001 |
|
Exudates/plugs in tonsils (n=420) |
1.48 ± 0.50 |
0.08 ± 0.28 |
1.40 ± 0.53 |
<0.001 |
|
Sore throat/swallowing pain (n=422) |
1.74 ± 0.44 |
0.11 ± 0.32 |
1.63 ± 0.50 |
<0.001 |
|
Fever (n=419) |
1.56 ± 0.50 |
0.03 ± 0.18 |
1.53 ± 0.51 |
<0.001 |
|
Interfering with daily activities (n=422) |
1.72 ± 0.45 |
0.09 ± 0.32 |
1.63 ± 0.51 |
<0.001 |
|
Total score (n=427) |
9.7 ± 2.02 |
0.59 ± 1.24 |
9.10 ± 2.23 |
<0.001 |
This table presents the percentage of patients with moderate or severe symptoms at baseline compared to Day 5. There was a dramatic reduction in severity across all parameters.
Table 2: Symptom Severity Reduction
|
Clinical parameter |
Severity |
Baseline (%) |
Day 5 (%) |
P value (change from baseline) |
|
Pharyngeal erythema
|
Moderate |
40.7% |
16.6%
|
<0.001
|
|
Severe |
59.3% |
0.2% |
||
|
Tonsillar erythema
|
Moderate |
37% |
11.9%
|
NA |
|
Severe |
63% |
0%
|
||
|
Presence of exudates/plugs in tonsils
|
Moderate |
52.9% |
7.6% |
<0.001
|
|
Severe |
47.1% |
0.2%
|
||
|
Sore throat/swallowing pain
|
Sore but can swallow |
26.5% |
10.2%
|
<0.001
|
|
Difficult to swallow |
73.5% |
0.2%
|
||
|
Fever in °C
|
37.6-38.5 |
44.5% |
3.3%
|
<0.001
|
|
≥38.6 |
55.5% |
0%
|
||
|
Interfering with daily activities |
Annoying but can work |
28.8% |
7.3% |
<0.001
|
|
Absent from work |
71.2% |
0.9% |
Most patients were rated as “very much improved” or “much improved” by investigators, reflecting strong clinical effectiveness.
Table 3: Clinical Global Impression (Day 5)
|
Rating |
% Patients |
|
Very much improved |
50.8% |
|
Much improved |
44.8% |
|
Minimally improved |
4.1% |
|
No change / worse |
<1% |
Safety: 2.1% reported adverse events
Conclusion
- A five-day azithromycin regimen was effective and safe for treating moderate to severe URTIs, including tonsillitis and pharyngitis, while minimizing complications
- Rapid symptom relief reduced disruption to daily life and enabled early return to work in Indian patients
- Azithromycin was well-tolerated with few adverse events, and high investigator ratings reinforced its efficacy and safety
- Further randomized prospective studies are needed to confirm these findings
Reference
Cureus. 2025 Aug 5;17(8):e89403








